Software for nuclear engineering

From physics.
To a better
energy future.

Our aim is to connect the physics, engineering and design of nuclear energy in one simulation platform. From the first concept to a virtual plant.

Exploring the possibilities of nuclear energy

Fusion / Fission / A connected future

The global nuclear outlook

A cleaner energy future.
An engineering imperative.

Countries are planning a larger role for nuclear power. Our aim is to help engineers turn that ambition into better-informed designs for dependable, low-carbon energy.

India 2047

100 GWe

Nuclear capacity target

The Nuclear Energy Mission sets a long-term goal for installed nuclear electricity capacity.

Government of India · 2026 ↗
Japan FY2040

20%

Electricity mix outlook

The Seventh Strategic Energy Plan envisages nuclear supplying around one-fifth of electricity.

METI energy outlook · 2025 ↗
United Kingdom 2050

Up to24 GW

Published roadmap ambition

The 2024 Civil Nuclear Roadmap sets out an ambition to expand nuclear generating capacity.

UK civil nuclear roadmap · 2024 ↗
United States 2050

400 GW

Nuclear capacity goal

The Department of Energy describes a national goal to expand nuclear energy capacity by mid-century.

US Department of Energy · 2026 ↗

Selected national targets and outlooks, reviewed 7 October 2026. These are policy ambitions, not guaranteed forecasts. Capacity (GW / GWe) and electricity share (%) measure different things; these figures concern fission power.

Milestones on the horizon
  1. 2033

    India · Small modular reactors

    Target: at least five indigenous SMRs operational.

  2. 2040

    Japan · Energy mix

    Outlook: around 20% nuclear electricity in FY2040.

  3. 2047

    India · Capacity expansion

    Target: 100 GWe of nuclear power.

  4. 2050

    UK & US · Long-term ambitions

    UK: up to 24 GW. US: 400 GW.

The engineering challenge

Complex physics.
A connected approach.

Achieving clean-energy goals means resolving complex design questions earlier. Connected simulation can help teams explore alternatives, understand interactions and assess safety-relevant behaviour before committing to hardware.

01 / DESIGN

Shorten the learning cycle

Our aim is to make it easier to compare concepts, automate repeat calculations and identify design constraints earlier, reducing avoidable rework.

02 / PHYSICS

See the system together

Connect thermal response, reactor behaviour and engineering limits to explore how a change in one subsystem affects the whole design.

03 / SAFETY

Explore demanding conditions

Our goal is to help engineers examine cooling performance, abnormal operating scenarios and uncertainty, so safety considerations inform design from the outset.

Safety remains an engineering responsibility.

Simulation supports assessment alongside experiments, qualified engineering review and regulatory oversight. Safety-analysis methods and computer codes require verification and validation. IAEA guidance ↗

The KSLP platform

Engineering insight,
across disciplines.

We are building a shared workbench for modelling, comparing and investigating nuclear energy concepts.

Our goal is a seamless journey from modelling individual components to exploring the performance of an entire energy system.

A connected modelling workflow
  1. 01

    Define the system

    Bring a concept and its components into focus.

  2. 02

    Connect the physics

    Subsystem interactions and energy flows.

  3. 03

    Explore the possibilities

    Design alternatives, performance and system trade-offs.

Our vision for connected engineering

The road ahead

A vision that connects
the whole journey.

Explore our roadmap
  1. 01

    Connected simulation

  2. 02

    Coupled engineering

  3. 03

    Design exploration

  4. 04

    Virtual plant